Loose-fill asbestos insulation register
From 30 May 2016, it is a material fact if a property is listed on the public register. This means that, if a premises is listed on the LFAI register, this information must be disclosed by the property manager or private landlord to new tenants.
Guidelines have been issued by the Director General to assist licensees and certificate holders in relation to misrepresentation offences under the Property, Stock and Business Agents Act 2002.
These Guidelines apply to all agents required to be licensed under the Property, Stock and Business Agents Act 2002.
They are intended to assist licensees and certificate holders better understand their legal obligations not to misrepresent the characteristics of properties offered for sale. The guidelines are not exhaustive nor intended to constitute legal advice. They are provided to clarify the types of statements or actions which could be interpreted as a misrepresentation or concealment of material facts, and the circumstances in which they might arise. Because they are intended as a guide only, they cannot describe all the potential circumstances which may need to be considered. The most effective guide for those working in the property services industry is provided through:
Agents are obliged to take responsibility for what they say and do (or don’t say and do) in their dealings with clients and customers. Agents and certificate holders should not regard themselves solely as a channel for the passing of information between the seller and the buyer. When information about a property has been provided to an agent verbally, a reasonable attempt should be made to check its accuracy. (This is particularly so if the agent may then adopt, recite or present that information as their own, or may be regarded as having done so.) For example, if a vendor verbally advises an agent that the area of a block of land is one hectare without documentary proof, the agent should seek some verification of this information, e.g. from Contract of Sale documents, before advertising the block’s size. A disclaimer may not be enough to avoid responsibility for advertised information if this information is misrepresented by the agent or is later found to be misleading.
Much of the information necessary for vendors and purchasers to make informed decisions will be provided to them by solicitors, financial advisors, conveyancers, surveyors, and/or through the building or pest inspections they commission. However, licensees and certificate holders are sources of key information for parties involved in property transactions who would reasonably rely on the representations made. This information must be based on facts which can reasonably be checked by an agent. This does not mean that agents are expected to do the work of specialist advisors such as solicitors or surveyors.
Licensees and certificate holders must not do or say anything that could mislead any parties involved in a property transaction. Statements or actions are considered to be misleading if they would lead a client or customer to believe in the existence of a state of affairs that in fact did not exist.
The legislation discussed in these guidelines contains provisions relating to misleading, false, deceptive, or unconscionable conduct in relation to the property services industry.
Section 51 of the Property, Stock and Business Agents Act 2002 deals with the issue of publishing false or misleading statements while section 52 covers misrepresentation by a licensee or registered person.
The Property, Stock and Business Agents Regulation 2014 contains rules of conduct (both general and specific) for licensees and certificate holders. Rule 3 of Schedule 1 of the Regulation provides that an agent or certificate holder must act honestly, fairly and professionally with all parties involved in a property transaction. Failure to comply with the rules of conduct also attracts penalties, which from 1 March 2007, increased significantly.
Agents and certificate holders should also take care to familiarise themselves with the requirements of the Australian Consumer Law in terms of misrepresentation, misleading, deceptive or unconscionable conduct.
Section 51 of the Property, Stock and Business Agents Act prohibits the publication of statements which are false, misleading or deceptive. Publications are defined broadly in the legislation and cover:
Licensees should ensure that all information in a publication is accurate and does not create a false impression. To clarify the issue of publishing misleading and deceptive material for those working in the property services industry, guidelines to assist agents when publishing photographic advertisements have been developed. For more information, go to the Advertising guidelines page.
Section 41 of the Fair Trading Act provides that when a person makes a representation about any future matter without having reasonable grounds to do so, the representation shall be taken to be misleading. In a property services context, predictions about trends in property values or potential returns on development / investments which are untrue or cannot be substantiated constitute misleading conduct.
Sections 72-76 of the Property, Stock and Business Agents Act specifically cover representations as to selling price of residential property. Further information about this can be found under the heading Understating Selling Price Estimates on this web page. An agent may be able to substantiate information about property markets which have a regular, cyclical pattern. However, some markets are particularly volatile and even experts cannot make predictions with any certainty. If clients require an estimate of future trends in these types of markets they should be made aware of the unpredictability of that market before comparing past and future trends.
Misrepresentation can be about what is not said as well as what is said. There is no stand alone duty of disclosure, but silence can be misleading in certain contexts, and this should be avoided. There is a need to consider the background of other facts against which the silence occurs. Agents need to consider whether silence in that context can lead reasonable people to believe that a particular state of affairs exists where it does not.
Remaining silent or only telling half the story where there is a reasonable expectation of disclosure means you are breaking the law.
Licensees and certificate holders must be open and honest with clients and customers. If information is known to the agent they must not conceal or suppress information about a property if there is a reasonable expectation that the information will be of concern to a buyer or seller and is not readily apparent.
Also, where information provided in an original statement subsequently changes and that change renders the original statement incorrect, the change must be conveyed to the relevant parties.
If a potential buyer asks a question about a property and the agent knows the answer, there is a responsibility to answer the question frankly and fully. If the agent does not know the answer s/he should undertake to obtain the information from the vendor or refer the person back to his or her conveyancer or relevant expert, depending on the nature of the query.
The intention of an agent or certificate holder in relation to misrepresentation is not relevant under the Property, Stock and Business Agents Act 2002. What is relevant is the impression a client or customer might gain and whether this would be likely to mislead them.
Section 52 (1) of the Act states that it is an offence against the Act if in the course of performing functions as a licensee or registered person, another person is induced to enter into any contract or arrangement through:
A defence exists, however, when the agent / certificate holder ‘…did not know, and had no reasonable cause to suspect’, [that his/her] statement, representation, or promise was false, misleading or deceptive [section 52(3)].
Legislative provisions relating to misrepresentation by concealment are based on false and misleading representations involving “a material fact”.
A material fact is a fact that would be important to a reasonable person in deciding whether or not to proceed with a particular transaction.
A recent Administrative Decisions Tribunal appeal decision pointed out that a fact can be 'material' in two ways:
“it can become ‘material’ because in the particular circumstances it is known by the agent to be material to the particular consumer, even though agents and consumers may not typically regard the matter as ‘material’. The other way in which it may become ‘material’ is by the application of an objective standard which has regard to what a reasonably informed consumer with a fair minded understanding of the real estate market, including the role of a real estate agent, would regard as ‘material’” .
Material facts are inherently related to issues of market value. They are facts which:
a) may be sufficiently significant or relevant to influence decisions on whether to buy, sell or rent; and/or
b) what market value would apply to buying, selling or renting.
Apart from individual circumstances where an agent understands that a particular issue is ‘material” to an individual, for the purposes of generally understanding the requirements of the law, agents should concern themselves with considering issues which are sensitive for a significant proportion of the population.
‘While an agent will not always know the intangible factors that bear on a decision to purchase, that is not what is required by the section . Absent a specific question from the purchaser or the independent determination by the agent…the question is an objective one to be viewed in all the circumstances. This will necessarily involve a question of reasonableness, providing protection for agents from a purchaser seeking to rely on the provision for whimsical or unreasonable claims of materiality.’
The Administrative Decisions Tribunal Appeal Panel pointed out the role of agents, as professionals in the real estate market, having market knowledge to assess whether particular aspects of a property are going to have an effect on its market value, and therefore whether it is ‘material’ to the market. Accordingly, the Tribunal further ruled that indications which would be relevant to determining whether something is a material fact could include:
Purchasers still need to take reasonable steps to inform themselves about a property. However, as the Tribunal appeals decision points out, ‘requiring a purchaser to raise all relevant issues in order to have them answered would be to subvert the intention of the section.’ The emphasis of section 52, as highlighted in the same Administrative Decisions Tribunal appeal decision, is on the agent informing the purchaser ‘of matters which could not be revealed through undertaking usual enquiries.’ Usual inquiries may include a physical inspection of the property, professional building and pest inspections, searches conducted by the purchaser’s solicitor or conveyancer.
Some ‘material facts’ about a property which may not be readily apparent could include:
In terms of a property which is to be put on the market, attention should be given to material facts which relate to the period during which the seller was the owner. Agents must conduct a physical inspection of the premises which are to be marketed for sale and obtain all relevant information necessary to complete the sales inspection report, as required by clauses 1 and 2 of the Rules of Conduct set out in Schedule 2 of the Property, Stock and Business Agents Regulation 2014.
Agents should discuss with sellers any market sensitive matters that are likely to be the subject of statements or representations by the agent in the course of marketing the property. During this process, it is important for the agent to gather information on aspects of the property which are sensitive to the market which will assist him/her in accurately and honestly representing the property.
Having gathered the relevant information necessary to market and promote a property, the agent must then ensure that this information is provided to potential purchasers.
Agents need to use their judgement in assessing individual circumstances as to when to discuss material facts. Timing may depend on the nature of the material fact. Facts of a non-sensitive nature such as the area of the land on which the property stands, would be provided as part of the standard marketing campaign.
Disclosure of more sensitive information may be more appropriately revealed when there are indications that a person is seriously considering purchasing the property.
When marketing or managing a property transaction it is important to remember that there is a difference between personal information and material facts. Material facts relate to the property, personal information relates to the individual parties involved in a property transaction.
As an example, an agent may inform a potential buyer that a serious crime had taken place at a property during the current or previous ownership. The agent provides this information because s/he judged the crime to be a material fact. If the agent then goes on to discuss the parties involved in the crime, s/he is providing personal information.
Information provided to a property seller in relation to for example, the estimated selling price (or price range) must be an honest appraisal based on a soundly researched assessment of the market.
Section 72A of the Property, Stock and Business Agents Act makes it an offence for an agent or agent’s employee to make a false representation to a seller or prospective seller of residential property as to the agent’s or employee’s true estimate of a property’s selling price.
The same requirements apply to advice about method of sale – relevant factors such as the current state of the property market and demand for the type of property to be marketed will need to be researched and discussed openly with the seller / potential seller.
Sections 73 and 73A of the Property, Stock and Business Agents Act states that during the marketing of a property for sale an agent must not falsely understate his/her true estimate of the selling price of that property. This understatement could be in the form of written or verbal advice to a prospective purchaser or in an advertisement which the agent published or caused to be published.